Built for the People Who Keep Athletics Websites Accurate.
SportsInfoEditor was founded by Steve Weaver, who became the youngest NCAA Division I Sports Information Director in history at age 21 in 1981, a record he held until 2025. During a 14-year collegiate athletics communications career, Steve earned more than 40 CSC publication awards, including 13 Best in the Nation honors. Steve understands the pressures facing today's athletics communications professionals because he lived them (and still does!). Rosters change. Coaches move. Seasons overlap. Deadlines never stop. Important website content can become outdated, missing, inaccurate, or inconsistent simply because there are not enough hours in the day to make sure it is right. SportsInfoEditor provides an independent review of public-facing athletics website content, helping athletics communications staffs identify issues before recruits, media members, donors, alumni, and fans find them.
Why SportsInfoEditor
SportsInfoEditor exists because no one understands an athletics website's content problems better than someone who spent years producing that content. Steve Weaver spent 14 years in collegiate athletics communications, writing game notes, managing rosters, updating records, and meeting the relentless publication demands of college athletics departments. That experience is the foundation of every audit.
Athletics communications is a small, specialized field. The terminology is specific, the expectations are unique, and the standards — from how you list a transfer's eligibility status to how you format a coaching staff bio — are understood by people who have done the work. SportsInfoEditor brings that insider perspective to every review, which means the feedback is practical, not generic.
The goal is simple: give athletics communications staffs an independent set of SID eyes that knows what to look for. Not a checklist generated by a crawler. Not a report from someone who has never written a game notes packet or updated a record book at midnight before a morning deadline. A review from someone who has been in that role — and knows exactly what gets missed when the workload is relentless.
What Automated Tools Overlook When Reviewing Content
Every audit is driven by human review and editorial judgment — not an automated scan. Automated tools catch some issues, but they miss the ones that matter most: the athlete whose transfer portal status is listed incorrectly, the coach whose title changed two seasons ago, the record that was broken but never updated. SportsInfoEditor reviews your site the way an experienced SID would — catching the details that don't look wrong to a computer but don't sound right to an experienced editor.
Want to Know If SportsInfoEditor Is the Right Fit?
The best way to find out is a direct conversation. Reach out and describe your site, your department's needs, and what's keeping you up at night — and we'll talk through whether an audit makes sense.
Contact Steve Today